VeinViewer is the only direct projection vascular imaging device clinically proven to improve peripheral vascular access by reducing the number of sticks and procedure time and improve patient satisfaction.
Study A:
| First Stick Success Rate |
49% |
80% |
| Procedures completed within 15 minutes |
53% |
87% |
Peer Review Journal: Pediatric Nursing®, A Biomedical Device to Improve Pediatric Vascular Access Success
Study B:
| Number of Attempts per IV |
2.08 |
1.18 |
| Time to start IV (minutes) |
17.06 |
6.60 |
| Patient Satisfaction Score* |
1.85 |
4.07 |
* 1-Very unsatisfied, 2 Unsatisfied, 3 Neutral, 4 Satisfied, 5 Very Satisfied
Cardinal Glennon Data Trial Summary
Study C: Rating of VeinViewer by nurses and doctors
| General effectiveness |
72% |
20% |
8% |
| Visibility of peripheral veins |
76% |
24% |
0% |
| Acceptance by families |
100% |
0% |
0% |
Strehle, Eugene-Matthais, MD. Making the Invisible Visible: Near-Infrared Spectroscopy and Phlebotomy in Children. Telemedicine and e-Health. October 2010;1-5. Peer Review Journal: Telemedicine, Making the Invisible Visible: Near-Infrared Spectroscopy and Phlebotomy in Children
Study D: Feeder veins marked for phlebectomy using naked-eye visualization and palpation versus VeinViewer only.
Peer Review Journal: Dermatologic Surgery, Vein Imaging: A New Method of Near-Infrared Imaging, Where a Processed Image is Projected onto the Surface of the Skin for the Enhancement of Vein Treatment
Study E: VeinViewer improved successful PICC placement with the most benefit seen in infants of greater GA (gestational age).
| Session 1 |
59% |
64% |
| Session 2 |
27% |
44% |
| Session 3 |
80% |
100% |
| Overall Success |
75% |
86% |
Peer Review Journal: A Randomized Trial of the VeinViewer Versus Standard Technique for Placement of Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters (PICC’s) in Neonates
Contact Christie for a demonstration of this innovative technology.